Leflunomide Treatment Does Not Protect Neural Cells following Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation (OGD) In Vitro.

Neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) affects 2-3 per 1000 live births in developed countries and up to 26 per 1000 live births in developing countries. It is estimated that of the 750,000 infants experiencing a hypoxic-ischemic event during birth per year, more than 400,000 will be severely affected. As treatment options are limited, rapidly identifying new therapeutic avenues is critical, and repurposing drugs already in clinical use offers a fast-track route to clinic. One emerging avenue for therapeutic intervention in neonatal HI is to target mitochondrial dysfunction, which occurs early in the development of brain injury. Mitochondrial dynamics are particularly affected, with mitochondrial fragmentation occurring at the expense of the pro-fusion protein Optic Atrophy (OPA)1. OPA1, together with mitofusins (MFN)1/2, are required for membrane fusion, and therefore, protecting their function may also safeguard mitochondrial dynamics. Leflunomide, an FDA-approved immunosuppressant, was recently identified as an activator of MFN2 with partial effects on OPA1 expression. We, therefore, treated C17.2 cells with Leflunomide before or after oxygen-glucose deprivation, an in vitro mimic of HI, to determine its efficacy as a neuroprotection and inhibitor of mitochondrial dysfunction. Leflunomide increased baseline OPA1 but not MFN2 expression in C17.2 cells. However, Leflunomide was unable to promote cell survival following OGD. Equally, there was no obvious effect on mitochondrial morphology or bioenergetics. These data align with studies suggesting that the tissue and mitochondrial protein profile of the target cell/tissue are critical for taking advantage of the therapeutic actions of Leflunomide.

Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) compared with leflunomide (LEF) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed with the following inclusion criteria: the fulfilment of the 2022 American College Classification/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for TAK, age ≥18 years, and written informed consent. Forty-four patients were treated with LEF (n=28) or ADA (n=16) therapy due to relapsing/refractory disease or toxicity from previous therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), at a median of 7.0 months (T1) and at 15.0 months of follow-up (T2). Data regarding disease activity, daily dose of prednisone, side effects and angiographic progression were analysed. RESULTS: LEF and ADA groups had similar features on the baseline visit. However, intravenous methylprednisolone was more frequently prescribed for the ADA group (p=0.019). On T1 and T2 visits, complete response rates were similar for ADA and LEF groups (75.0% and 88.5%; p=0.397 and 62.5% vs 78.3%; p=0.307), respectively. The differences remained non-significant after adjusting for baseline variables by propensity score matching. Although the ADA group had a higher median daily prednisone on visit T1 (p=0.004), it was similar on visit T2 (p=0.595). Similar rates of angiographic progression were observed in ADA and LEF groups (40% vs 25%; p=0.467). Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed only in the LEF group (17.9%). CONCLUSION: LEF and ADA had comparable outcomes after a median of 15.0 months of follow-up. However, withdrawal from therapy and mild-to-moderate adverse events were only observed in the LEF group.

[Marked improvement in rheumatoid lung nodules after treatment with tocilizumab combined with glucocorticoids and leflunomide: a case report and literature review].

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune disorder, is characterized by erosive inflammation of bone and cartilage, leading to progressive joint destruction. Pulmonary involvement occurs in approximately 60% of RA patients, manifests most commonly as interstitial lung disease and, less commonly, as rheumatoid lung nodules. Here, we report a 50-year-old woman, non-smoker, with recurrent cough and sputum of 7 years' duration, accompanied by a chest CT showing multiple cavitary nodules in both lungs. She had been treated empirically at several medical centers and was finally diagnosed with rheumatoid lung nodules. Marked improvement in rheumatoid lung nodules was observed after treatment with tocilizumab in combination with glucocorticoids and leflunomide. The aim of this study was to improve clinicians' understanding of rheumatoid lung nodules by analyzing the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of this case, and reviewing the relevant medical literature.

Leflunomide as adjunct therapy for BK viremia management in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: BK viremia after kidney transplantation (KT) poses significant risk for BK virus-associated nephropathy and impacts graft survival. Conventional treatment involves reduction of immunosuppression, which in turn may increase risk for rejection. To address this dilemma, use of anti-viral therapy with immunosuppressive properties such as leflunomide is an attractive option. METHODS: We performed a multi-center, retrospective chart review to report tolerability and effectiveness of leflunomide use for the eradication of BK viremia and prevention of BK virus-associated nephropathy in pediatric KT recipients. RESULTS: Seventy patients prescribed leflunomide were included and were followed up from initiation until 1 year following leflunomide completion. BK viremia was eradicated in 64 (91.4%) patients including 8 of 11 with nephropathy (BKVN) on initial biopsy. Reduced anti-proliferative medication (AP) dosing was not associated with increase in biopsy proven rejection (BPAR). However, complete discontinuation of AP during leflunomide therapy was associated with increase in BPAR in uni- and multivariate logistic regression, as was targeted reduction in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) trough goals. One graft was lost to BKVN. There was no significant association found between time to BK eradication and leflunomide trough concentration, mycophenolate dose reduction, or steroid use (univariate logistic regression). Few leflunomide adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported (most commonly: gastrointestinal, hematologic). CONCLUSION: Leflunomide is a promising adjunctive treatment to immunosuppression reduction for BK virus eradication with minimal ADR. AP reduction, not discontinuation, and judicious reduction in CNI trough goals with close monitoring, is a promising strategy for treatment of BK viremia with concomitant use of leflunomide therapy.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide for progressive IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of immunosuppressive and corticosteroid treatments for Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) remains thoroughly evaluated. We undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids plus leflunomide for progressive IgA nephropathy. METHODS: Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. We also searched the references of the included studies. Our protocol followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Eligibility criteria were defined using a PICOS framework. RESULTS: Our study included three articles presenting 342 patient cases. Findings revealed that low-dose corticosteroids combined with the leflunomide group were effective in relieving urine protein excretion (UPE) [mean difference (MD) = -0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41 to -0.30, P < 0.00001] compared with the full-dose corticosteroids group. Regarding serum creatinine (SCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), complete remission rate, and overall response rate, there was no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Regarding safety, low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events [odds ratio (OR): 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.91, P = 0.04]. Besides, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of respiratory infection, abnormal liver function, diarrhea, herpes zoster, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, pneumonia, diabetes, and urinary tract infection (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide are a safe and effective treatment for progressive IgA nephropathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022361883.

Retrospective evaluation of leflunomide as an adjunctive therapy in dogs with non-associative immune-mediated thrombocytopenia: 20 cases (2008-2021).

OBJECTIVE: To describe leflunomide as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of non-associative immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of dogs with a diagnosis of non-associative immune-mediated thrombocytopenia treated with leflunomide March 2008 to September 2021 was conducted. Data collected included signalment, clinical signs, physical examination findings and diagnostic testing performed. Medications administered, duration of hospital stay, time to platelet concentration >150×109/L and adverse events during leflunomide therapy were recorded. Relapses within a year of diagnosis were reported. RESULTS: A total of 20 client-owned dogs met inclusion criteria. Nineteen of 20 dogs (95%) achieved a platelet concentration >150×109/L with leflunomide and prednisone combination therapy and four dogs (21.1%) relapsed during treatment or shortly after treatment. Adverse effects included diarrhoea (n=5), mild lymphopenia (n=9) and mild intermittent anaemia (n=1). A single dog developed hepatotoxicity presumed to be secondary to leflunomide therapy that resolved after drug discontinuation. One dog was treated for aspiration pneumonia during treatment. Two dogs were euthanased while receiving leflunomide. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Length of hospitalisation, time to platelet recovery, treatment response and relapse rate were comparable with alternative treatment protocols. Most adverse effects did not require leflunomide dose adjustment; however, two dogs died while undergoing leflunomide treatment and there is compelling evidence that one of these dogs experienced fatal infection secondary to immune-suppression. Hepatotoxicity remains a known complication of leflunomide treatment and serial biochemistry testing is recommended.

Medication utilisation trends during pregnancy and factors influencing adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate medication utilisation trends during pregnancy and identify factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Female patients with RA aged 20-50 years were identified from the Korean national health insurance database between 2010 and 2020. Pregnancy episodes were divided into two groups according to pregnancy outcome: the delivery group and the APO group (abortion and stillbirth). The characteristics and medication utilisation patterns were compared between the two groups, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors associated with APOs. RESULTS: A total of 5728 pregnancy episodes were included, comprising 4576 delivery episodes and 1152 APO episodes. The mean maternal age for all pregnancy episodes was 33.7 years; 33.3 years in the delivery group and 33.7 years in the APO group. Hydroxychloroquine was the most commonly used conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) during the preconception period and pregnancy in both groups. The prescription rate of all DMARDs decreased rapidly during pregnancy. In the multivariable analysis, use of methotrexate (adjusted OR (aOR): 2.14, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.92) and leflunomide (aOR: 2.68, 95% CI 1.39 to 5.15) within 3 months before conception was associated with APOs. CONCLUSION: Methotrexate and leflunomide are associated with an increased possibility of APOs, emphasising the importance of appropriate medication adjustment when planning for pregnancy.

Use of leflunomide among girls and women of childbearing age and occurrence of leflunomide-exposed pregnancies in Germany.

Leflunomide is contraindicated during pregnancy and treatment cessation is recommended two years before pregnancy. We aimed to describe leflunomide use in women of childbearing age in Germany, the occurrence of pregnancies in women using leflunomide and malformations among children possibly exposed in utero. Using the GePaRD database (claims data, ∼20% of the German population), we determined annual age-standardized prevalences of leflunomide use between 2004 and 2019 among females aged 13-49 years. Further, we estimated the number of exposed pregnancies by assessing whether the exposure window assigned to the last dispensation before pregnancy (days covered by the dispensation plus two years) overlapped the onset of pregnancy or whether there was a dispensation in the first eight weeks of pregnancy. For exposed live births, a mother-baby linkage was performed and the presence of congenital malformation was assessed. The age-standardized prevalence of leflunomide use ranged between 0.34 and 0.46 per 1000 females during the study period. About one third of the users were ≤40 years. We identified 205 leflunomide-exposed pregnancies ending during the study period. 71% of these pregnancies ended in a live birth (26% preterm) and 10% in an induced abortion. In 86% of the live births (n=125) the mother-baby linkage was successful. Among these 125 children, 13 children (10%) had congenital malformations. In conclusion, we observed a considerable number of pregnancies in women using leflunomide in the two years before or during early pregnancy. This highlights the importance of monitoring the implementation of existing risk minimization measures for leflunomide in Germany.

Methotrexate for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood. Methotrexate has broad immunomodulatory properties and is the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). This is an update of a 2001 Cochrane review. It supports a living guideline for children and young people with JIA. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of methotrexate for children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. SEARCH METHODS: The Australian JIA Living Guideline Working Group created a registry of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of JIA by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registries. The date of the most recent search of online databases was 1 February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for RCTs that compared methotrexate with placebo, no treatment, or another DMARD (with or without concomitant therapies) in children and young people (aged up to 18 years) with JIA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. The main comparison was methotrexate versus placebo. Our outcomes were treatment response, sustained clinically inactive disease, function, pain, participant global assessment of well-being, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We identified three new trials in this update, bringing the total number of included RCTs to five (575 participants). Three trials evaluated oral methotrexate versus placebo, one evaluated methotrexate plus intra-articular glucocorticoid (IAGC) therapy versus IAGC therapy alone, and one evaluated methotrexate versus leflunomide. Doses of methotrexate ranged from 5 mg/m2/week to 15 mg/m2/week in four trials, and participants in the methotrexate group of the remaining trial received 0.5 mg/kg/week. Trial size varied from 31 to 226 participants. The average age of participants ranged from four to 10 years. Most participants were females and most had nonsystemic JIA. The study that evaluated methotrexate plus IAGC therapy versus IAGC therapy alone recruited children and young people with the oligoarticular disease subtype of JIA. Two placebo-controlled trials and the trial of methotrexate versus leflunomide were adequately randomised and blinded, and likely not susceptible to important biases. One placebo-controlled trial may have been susceptible to selection bias due to lack of adequate reporting of randomisation methods. The trial investigating the addition of methotrexate to IAGC therapy was susceptible to performance and detection biases. Methotrexate versus placebo Methotrexate compared with placebo may increase the number of children and young people who achieve treatment response up to six months (absolute difference of 163 more per 1000 people; risk ratio (RR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 2.31; I2 = 0%; 3 trials, 328 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, methotrexate compared with placebo may have little or no effect on pain as measured on an increasing scale of 0 to 100 (mean difference (MD) -1.10 points, 95% CI -9.09 to 6.88; 1 trial, 114 participants), improvement in participant global assessment of well-being (absolute difference of 92 more per 1000 people; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.72; 1 trial, 176 participants), occurrence of serious adverse events (absolute difference of 5 fewer per 1000 people; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.97; 3 trials, 328 participants), and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 3.46, 95% CI 0.60 to 19.79; 3 trials, 328 participants) up to six months. We could not estimate the absolute difference for withdrawals due to adverse events because there were no withdrawals in the placebo group. All outcomes were reported within six months of randomisation. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low for all outcomes due to indirectness (suboptimal dosing of methotrexate and diverse outcome measures) and imprecision (few participants and low event rates). No trials reported function or the number of participants with sustained clinically inactive disease. Serious adverse events included liver derangement, abdominal pain, and inadvertent overdose. Methotrexate plus intra-articular corticosteroid therapy versus intra-articular corticosteroid therapy alone Methotrexate plus IAGC therapy compared with IAGC therapy alone may have little or no effect on the probability of sustained clinically inactive disease or the rate of withdrawals due to adverse events up to 12 months in children and young people with the oligoarticular subtype of JIA (low-certainty evidence). We could not calculate the absolute difference in withdrawals due to adverse events because there were no withdrawals in the control group. We are uncertain if there is any difference between the interventions in the risk of severe adverse events, because none were reported. The study did not report treatment response, function, pain, or participant global assessment of well-being. Methotrexate versus an alternative disease-modifying antirheumatic drug Methotrexate compared with leflunomide may have little or no effect on the probability of treatment response or on function, participant global assessment of well-being, risk of serious adverse events, and rate of withdrawals due to adverse events up to four months. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes to low due to imprecision. The study did not report pain or sustained clinically inactive disease. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Oral methotrexate (5 mg/m2/week to 15 mg/m2/week) compared with placebo may increase the number of children and young people achieving treatment response but may have little or no effect on pain or participant global assessment of well-being. Oral methotrexate plus IAGC injections compared to IAGC injections alone may have little or no effect on the likelihood of sustained clinically inactive disease among children and young people with oligoarticular JIA. Similarly, methotrexate compared with leflunomide may have little or no effect on treatment response, function, and participant global assessment of well-being. Serious adverse events due to methotrexate appear to be rare. We will update this review as new evidence becomes available to inform the living guideline.

Folate decorated chitosan-chondroitin sulfate nanoparticles loaded hydrogel for targeting macrophages against rheumatoid arthritis.

Inflammatory cell infiltration, particularly macrophages, plays a major contribution to the pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Exploiting the overexpression of folate receptors (FR-ß) on these recruited macrophages has gained significant attraction for ligand-targeted delivery. Leflunomide (LEF), being an immunomodulatory agent is considered the cornerstone of the therapy, however, its oral efficacy is impeded by low solubility and escalating adverse effects profile. Therefore, in the present work, we developed Folate-conjugated chitosan-chondroitin sulfate nanoparticles encapsulating LEF for selective targeting at inflammatory sites in RA. For this purpose, the folate group was first conjugated with the chitosan polymer. After which, Folate Leflunomide Nanoparticles (FA-LEF-NPs) were synthesized through the ionotropic gelation method by employing FA-CHI and CHS. The polymers CHI and CHS were also presented with innate anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic attributes that were helpful in provision of synergistic effects to the formulation. These nanoparticles were further fabricated into a hydrogel, employing almond oil (A.O) as a permeation enhancer. The in vivo studies justified the preferential accumulation of FA-conjugated nanoparticles at inflamed joints more than any other organ in comparison to the free LEF and LEF-NPs formulation. The FA-LEF-NPs loaded hydrogel also ascertained a minimal adverse effect profile with an improvement of inflammatory cytokines expression.

Leflunomide for the Treatment of Immune-Mediated Uveitis in a Dog.

A 5 yr old castrated male bichon frise presented with chronic bilateral uveitis that had previously been controlled with systemic steroid administration for 6 mo, resulting in weight gain, polyuria, and polydipsia. To control the uveitis without systemic side effects, oral cyclosporine was started after discontinuing oral steroid, but discontinued one month later because of severe vomiting. Leflunomide (2 mg/kg q 12 hr) was initiated, and the uveitis symptoms resolved after 2 mo. The dose was tapered according to the remission of clinical signs, with no relapse during the following 13 mo. Leflunomide therapy was then discontinued due to vomiting caused by severe gastroenteritis and pancreatitis, and topical prednisolone monotherapy was continued . At 8 mo after discontinuation of leflunomide, bilateral uveitis recurred, and leflunomide therapy was resumed. However, the patient lost vision due to the progression of clinical signs at 33 mo after commencing leflunomide, and evisceration of the glaucomatous right eye was performed at 43 mo. Histopathologic examination revealed lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration and melanin-laden macrophages in the uveal tissue, and the patient was diagnosed with immune-mediated uveitis. This case indicated that oral leflunomide may be a viable treatment option for canine idiopathic immune-mediated uveitis.

Comparison of outcomes of azathioprine, leflunomide and allergen avoidance in patients with patch test-positive pigmented contact dermatitis: a randomized comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD) is a noneczematous form of allergic contact dermatitis characterized by dermal hyperpigmentation. Allergen avoidance is the cornerstone of therapy, but it is difficult to achieve. The use of immunosuppressives seems rational, but data are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with azathioprine (AZA), leflunomide and allergen avoidance (AA) in patients with PCD. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted on 28 patients with patch test-positive PCD who were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: AZA 2 mg kg-1 daily for 24 weeks + AA (n = 10); leflunomide (LEF) 20 mg daily for 24 weeks + -AA (n = 8); AA alone (n = 10). Patients were followed up for an additional 24 weeks. The Dermal Pigmentation Area and Severity Index (DPASI) score and Hindi Melasma Quality of Life scale (MELASQOL) were used to assess hyperpigmentation and quality of life (QoL). respectively. RESULTS: Hair colorants (n = 12) and paraphenylenediamine (n = 8) were the most common allergens. Mean (SD) DPASI score decreased from 30.97 (3.69), 32.35 (3.90) and 31.86 (3.47) to 13.78 (4.25), 21.67 (2.99) and 20.64 (3.82) at 48 weeks in the three groups, respectively (P < 0.001); the maximum percentage decline was seen with AZA (56%). Mean (SD) MELASQOL score was reduced in the three treatment groups from 48.0 (6.46), 46.75 (3.69) and 46.6 (4.65) to 19.6 (6.98), 24.5 (5.80) and 24.0 (5.49), respectively, at 48 weeks (P < 0.001). Reductions in DPASI and Hindi MELASQOL scores were significantly correlated. The most frequent adverse event was transaminitis in both the AZA and LEF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on AZA achieved a statistically significantly greater reduction in DPASI and MELASQOL score; therefore, AZA may fulfil an unmet need in PCD treatment. An objective reduction in hyperpigmentation was paralleled by an improvement in QoL score, reiterating the need for active management of this disease.

Long-term efficacy and safety of leflunomide combined with low-dose prednisone in treatment of myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Leflunomide and low-dose prednisone (0.25 mg/kg/day) (LEF + Pred) rapidly improved the clinical symptoms of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. Here, we aimed to analyze the long-term efficacy and safety of LEF + Pred in MG patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled MG patients treated with LEF + Pred in our center between 2012 and 2020. We reviewed all the MG patients continuously treated with LEF + Pred for more than 1 year. MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) profile score and quantitative MG scale (QMG) score in each clinical follow-up visits were collected for the efficacy analysis. The laboratory testing results of MG patients, the relevant chief complain and physical examination results in each follow-up visits were collected for the safety evaluation. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients were examined. Effective treatment was achieved in 58.3% of patients after 1 month and in 88.4% after 12 months. Overall, 63 patients (61.2%) exhibited only minimal manifestations after 12 months of treatment. The average MG-ADL score decreased from 6.0 to 1.0, while the average QMG score decreased from 10.0 to 4.0. The decrease in MG-ADL and QMG scores of patients with generalized MG was more pronounced than those of the ocular MG patients. Patients with MG who had a thymectomy had a smaller decrease in MG-ADL and QMG scores than those who did not have a thymectomy. Sixteen adverse effects associated with LEF + Pred were observed; none was severe. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term LEF + Pred therapy could considerably improve clinical symptoms in MG patients while being well tolerated with just few side effects.

New-onset atrial fibrillation in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: association with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially lethal complication that leads to increased hospitalization, disability and mortality. Furthermore, the risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in RA. We evaluated whether DMARD treatment is associated with incident AF in patients with seropositive RA (SPRA). METHODS: The South Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database was used to identify patients newly diagnosed with SPRA between 2010 and 2020. A nested case-control analysis was performed to match AF-affected patients to unaffected controls for age, sex, follow-up duration, and index year of SPRA diagnosis at a 1:4 ratio. Adjusted conditional logistic regression was used to identify the predictive factors for AF. RESULTS: Of the 108 085 patients with SPRA, 2,629 (2.4%) developed new-onset AF, and the proportion of females was ∼67%. In the matched population, pre-existing comorbidities of hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure were associated with increased risk of AF. Meanwhile, the use of methotrexate (MTX) decreased the risk of incident AF [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.89], whereas the use of leflunomide (LEF) increased AF (aOR, 1.21). In a subgroup of patients aged ≥50 years, LEF and adalimumab increased the occurrence of AF, while MTX decreased AF in males and LEF increased this risk in females. CONCLUSION: Although the number of subjects developing new-onset AF was small, MTX decreased and LEF increased incident AF in patients with RA. Especially, a distinct pattern of AF risk with DMARDs usage was observed according to age and sex.

Leflunomide-induced collagenous colitis: a case report and literature review.

We describe a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and Hashimoto's thyroiditis who developed chronic diarrhea and subsequently diagnosed with collagenous colitis (CC) 5 years after leflunomide initiation. Cessation of leflunomide resulted in complete resolution of diarrhea within 2 months. Although rare, leflunomide-induced colitis should be considered in patients with otherwise unexplained chronic diarrhea. Diagnosis is challenging as symptom onset can occur many years after leflunomide initiation, but diarrheal symptoms typically resolve within weeks to months of stopping the instigating drug.

Treatment of BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Paediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Leflunomide Versus Cidofovir.

OBJECTIVES: BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is a clinicopathological entity that negatively affects graft function in kidney transplant recipients. We compared the efficacy of leflunomide and cidofovir to treat BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of pediatric recipients with BK viremia for the period 2004 through 2019 were reviewed retrospectively, and patients diagnosed with BK polyomavirusassociated nephro-pathy were included in the study. A serum BK virus level above 104 copies/mL was accepted as BK viremia. We defined BK polyomavirusassociated nephropathy as detection of BK virus SV40 antigen on immunochemistry staining of renal graft tissue accompanied by signs of tubulointerstitial nephritis or elevated serum creatinine in addition to BK viremia. RESULTS: Of 304 kidney transplant recipients, 53 had persistent BK viremia; 36 of these patients (61.1% male) were included in the study with the diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Twelve patients (33.3%) received cidofovir, and 14 (38.8%) received leflunomide. Results were similar between the cidofovir and leflunomide groups for serum creatinine level at last follow-up (0.91 ± 0.29 vs 0.94 ± 0.37 mg/dL, respectively; P = .843) and graft failure rate (8.3% vs 14.2%, respectively; P = .632). Graft failure was observed in 8.3% of patients with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Leflunomide and cidofovir showed similar efficacy for treatment of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

Retrospective evaluation of prognosis and survival with various immunosuppressants in 82 dogs diagnosed with meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology (2010-2021).

BACKGROUND: Meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology (MUE) is a comprehensive term for non-infectious inflammatory brain diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) caused by abnormal autoimmune responses. This study aims to compare the differences in survival and clinical response of MUE according to the adjuvant immunosuppressant use. Medical records of 82 dogs diagnosed with MUE were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The overall survival time was 769 days (range 14-2687 days). The median survival time for each adjunctive was: leflunomide 1035 days (range 126-2163 days), mycophenolate mofetil 865 days (range 39-2191 days), cyclosporin 441 days (range 11-2176 days), cytosine arabinoside 754 days (range 6-1898 days) and a combination of mycophenolate mofetil and cytosine arabinoside 132 days (range 23-1227 days). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse events according to the immunosuppressants, but moderate to severe anemia was confirmed in 3 patients (18.7%) in the leflunomide group. CONCLUSIONS: The survival time and response rate of MUE dogs differed depending on which adjunctive immunosuppressants were used. Leflunomide showed a long survival time and a relatively good response rate in dogs with MUE. However, a large-scale further study with standardized doses of immunosuppressants and supportive treatment and constant monitoring interval is needed.

Comparative Study of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Leflunomide Combination Therapy With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Single Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients With BK Virus Infection: Single-Center Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Nephropathy due to BK virus infection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and loss. No specific treatment has been developed for the BK virus. Here, we compared the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and leflunomide versus intravenous immunoglobulin to treat BK virus nephropathy after renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixteen kidney transplant patients with BK virus infection were randomly divided into 2 groups; 1 group received intravenous immunoglobulin, and another group received leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Results of a polymerase chain reaction test for BK virus after 2 months of treatment were negative in 3 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group and in 7 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group. The amount of BK virus decreased significantly in each group, and a significant difference was observed between the 2 groups after 3 months (P = .014). The average level of creatinine in the intravenous immunoglobulin group at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment was 1.7 ± 0.23, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3, respectively, and in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group was 2.1 ± 0.75, 1.76 ± 0.37, and 1.4 ± 0.18, respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although BK viral load decreased significantly in both groups, there was a significant difference between patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin versus those who received the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide after 3 months. The addition of leflunomide to the intravenous immunoglobulin treatment seems to have a better effect in reducing BK viral load. However, further studies with a larger sample and longer duration are needed.

Effect of Leflunomide on Treatment of Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients With BK Virus Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Infection with the BK virus is a significant complication after renal transplant and can progress to BK virus nephropathy and graft dysfunction. There is no consensus on the management of BK virus infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients. The most common therapeutic option is immunosuppression reduction, which can increase rejection risk. We aimed to examine the effect of leflunomide, an agent with antiviral and immunosuppressive actions, in a case series of pediatric renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine screening with blood BK virus DNA polymerase chain reaction was performed regularly in all of our renal transplant patients. When BK virus was detected, we reduced tacrolimus levels, discontinued mycophenolate mofetil, and started active treatment with leflunomide. Treatment with leflunomide was continued until BK virus was undetectable by polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 blood samples 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: All pediatric patients developed BK virus infection in a mean period of 3.9 months after transplant. Graft dysfunction was evident in all patients with 20% to 100% elevation of creatinine from baseline. Afterleflunomide initiation, all patients had undetectable levels of BK virus by plasma polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 different samples within a mean period of 3.4 months, and renal function had normalized back to the baseline. None of our patients had evidence of hepatotoxicity or anemia on regular monitoring, with no other adverse events. Renal function remained stable in the follow-up period with no reoccurrence of BK viremia up to the date of this writing. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with leflunomide resulted in rapid BK virus clearance and preservation of renal function with no adverse effects.

Therapeutic strategies against BK polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The selection of antiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection has been extensively debated. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of various treatments for BKPyV infection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies regarding drug treatments for BKPyV viremia/DNAemia published between January 1, 1970 and September 30, 2022. Two independent authors screened the published studies, extracted pertinent data, and evaluated their methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 4.2.2. RESULTS: A total of 33 published studies involving 986 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, therapeutic interventions comprised immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), cidofovir, or mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction alone for serum BKPyV clearance was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77; I2 = 78%). Moreover, the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction in combination with leflunomide, cidofovir, IVIG, or mTORi therapy for serum BKPyV clearance was 61% (95% CI: 0.47-0.74; I2 = 83%), 71% (95% CI: 0.63-0.78; I2 = 0), 87% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I2 = 45%), and 80% (95% CI: 0.59-1.00; I2 = 58%), respectively. Compared to immunosuppression reduction alone, immunosuppression reduction combined with IVIG therapy offered a statistically significant benefit in serum BKPyV clearance (P < 0.01) with minimal adverse reactions, whereas other adjunctive drug treatments did not demonstrate considerable effects. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing immunosuppression remains the primary approach for treating BKPyV infection. Although the combination treatment with IVIG proved to be most effective, other agents might offer varied antiviral advantages of high heterogeneity, which should be substantiated in future long-term randomized controlled trials.